[Self-promoting post] New Article: Progress and the Taking of Indigenous Land

[Self-promoting post] New Article: Ezra Rosser, Progress and the Taking of Indigenous Land, 85 Ohio State Law Journal __ (forthcoming 2024). Abstract below:

The taking of Indigenous land in furtherance of other societal goals is so ubiquitous and so fundamental to the American project that sometimes acts of dispossession are not even recognized as such. This Article argues that the generally accepted understanding of Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff, a key case of the American takings law canon, is wrong because it overlooks Native Hawaiian claims to the land taken. Hawai‘i’s Land Reform Act allowed tenants a right to purchase land over the objections of the owner of the underlying property and in Midkiff the U.S. Supreme Court said that states had the right to use their eminent domain authority in such a way. The common understanding of the case is that it is a progressive victory, an example of how government can fight back against inequality and the power of large landowners. But beneath the surface, this Article argues, the case is really about dispossession. By showing how land reform predictably worked to transfer Indigenous land to upper class, relatively wealthy tenants, the Article situates Midkiff within a long history of taking Native land in order to accomplish progressive ends. By seeing Midkiff for what it is—a judicially authorized taking of Indigenous land—the significance of the case within the Property and Indian Law cannons can be more fully appreciated. Indigenous peoples are often forced to pay—in the form of diminishment of their property rights—for progressive victories, with their losses swept under the rug by courts and scholars alike. The Midkiff decision is part of a pattern of treating the property rights of Indigenous peoples as impediments to progress.

Editor’s Note: This article is primarily of interest to property law and Indian law scholars, but because it involved a taking done ostensibly for the purposes of land reform as an anti-oligarchy move (and a case celebrated as such), it might also interest poverty law and con law people as well. If you have thoughts, please do email me at erosser@wcl.american.edu. A big thanks to Georgetown Law for letting me workshop it during my time as a visiting professor this semester, to my numerous terrific RAs who helped with this, to Ohio State L.J. for their interest in the piece, and, most importantly, to my wife for putting up with way WAY too many discussions of Hawaiian history with me.

Leave a comment